The inhibition of leaf extract Moringaoleifera on the formation biofilm bacteria Enterococcus faecalis

Authors

  • Linda Rochyani Departement of Conservative Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Hang Tuah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v14i1.7

Keywords:

Biofilm, Enterococcus faecalis, Moringaoleifera

Abstract

Background: Enterococcus faecalisis the most common bacteria that cause failure to root canal treatment, which can become very resistant under biofilms. Moringaoleifera has antibacterial properties and may affect the multidrug-resistant bacteria. Purpose: This study aimed to observe the inhibition of Moringaoleifera leaf extract on the biofilm formation of bacteria Enterococcus faecalis. Method: This study was true experimental laboratory research with post-test only control group design and tested using biofilm method, divided into six groups, each group consisted of eight samples. The control groups were: K- (CMC 0,1%), K+ (ChKM), and four treatment groups were: P1 (Moringaoleifera 20%), P2 (Moringaoleifera 40%), P3 (Moringaoleifera 60%), P4 (Moringaoleifera 80%). Antibacterial inhibition was determined by the value of Optical Density in the ELISA Reader. Data analysis using Kruskal-wallis followed by Mann-Whitney test. Results: There were significant differences (p <0.05) seen from the percentage value of biofilm inhibition, on the K - (0 %) group compared with K+ (47,69%), P1(7,68%), P2 (21,13%), P3 (42,33%) and P4 (55,78%), as well on K + group (ChKM) compared with P4 group (Moringaoleifera 80%). Conclusion: Moringaoleiferaleaf extract has inhibition effect for the formation of bacteria Enterococcus faecalis biofilm and the effect is 80% greater than ChKM.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cogulu, D., Uzel, A., Oncag, O., Aksoy, SC., Eronat, C. Detection of Enterococcus faecalis in necrotic teeth root canals by culture and polymerase chain reaction methods. European Journal of Dentistry. 2007; (1) :216-21

Walton RE dan Torabineiad M. Prinsip dan Praktik Ilmu Endodonsia. Edisi 3. EGC. Jakarta: 2008.

Garg N dan Garg A. Text Book of Endodontics. Bangladesh, India. Edisi 3. Penerbit: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers; 2014. p.51-55.

Sari AN dan Untara TE. Root Canal Retreatment Menggunakan Kombinasi Kalsium Hidroksida dan Chlorhexidine Sebagai Medikamen Intra Kanal Insisivus Sentral Kiri Maksila. Maj Ked Gi. 2014; 21(2): 165-170.

Michael M. Hoen, DDS, and Frank E. Pink, DDS, MS. Contemporary Endodontic Retreatments: An Analysis based on Clinical Treatment Findings. Journal of Endodontics. 2002; 28(12) : 834-836.

Mulyawati E. Peran Bahan Disinfeksi Pada Perawatan Saluran Akar. Maj KejGi; 2011; 18(2): p.205-209.

Tamara, R., Rochyani, L., Teguh, P. Daya Hambat Ekstrak Teripang Emas (Stichopushermanii) terhadap Bakteri Enterococcus faecalis. Denta Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi. 2015; 9 (1): 36-46.

Karale, R., Thakore, A., Shetty, V.K. “Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy of 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, High-Frequency Alternating Current and 2% Chorhexidine on Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study”.J Conserv Dent. 2011; 14(1): 2-5.

Jaju, Sushma dan Jaju, dan Prashant P. Newer Root Canal Irrigants in Horizon : A Review. International Journal of Dentistry. 2011. Available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/851359

Stuart CH, Schwartz SA, Beeson TJ, Owatz CB, Enterococcus faecalis: Its role in root canal treatment Failure and current concepts in retreatment. Journal of endodontics. 2006; 32(2): 93-98.

Athanassidis, Abbott PV, dan Walsh LJ. The Use of Calsium Hydroxyde, Antibiotics, and Biocides as Antimicrobual Medikamen in Endodontics. Australian Dental Journal. 2007; 52(2): 52-57. Available from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.tb00527.x/pdf

Kuntari LM, Wignyo H, danMulyawati E. Perbedaan Daya Antibakteri Klorheksidin 2% dan Berbagai Konsentrasi Sodium Hipoklorit Kombinasi Omeprazole 8,5% Terhadap Enterococcus faecalis. J Ked Gi. 2014;5(2): p.139-149.

Siquera JF, Rocas IN, Favieri A, dan Lima KC. Mechanical Reduction of the Bacterial Population in the Root Canal by Three Instrumentation Techniques. JOE. 2009; 25(5): p.332-335. Available at http://www.endoexperience.com/documents/5.pdf

Wahyudi, D. UjiEfektivitas Ekstrak Seledri (Apiumgraveolens) Sebagai Penghambat Produksi Biofilm Pada Salmonella typhi. Jurnal Biomedika. 2014; 7(2) : 1-10

Charyadie, F., Adi, S., Sari, R. Daya Hambat Ekstrak Daun Alpukat (Persea americana, MIll.) Terhadap Pertumbuhan Enterococcus faecalis. Denta Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi. 2014; 8(1): 1-10.

Dammaschke T, Jung N, Harks I, dan Schafer E. The Effect of Different Root Canal Medicament on The Elimination of Enterococcus faecalis ex vivo. European Journal of Dentistry. 2013; 7(4): p. 442-448. Available from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4053669/

Adewole, S. & Caxton-Martins, E. Morphological Changes and Hypoglycemic Effects of Annona Muricata Linn. (Annonaceae) Leaf Aqueous Extract on Pancreatic B-Cells of Streptozotocin-Treated Diabetic Rats.African Journal of Biomedical Research. 2006; 9: 173-87.

Putra IWDP, Dharmayudha AAG, Sudimartini LM. Identifikasi Senyawa Kimia Ekstrak Etanol Daun Kelor ( Moringa oleifera L ) di Bali. Indonesia Medicus Veterinus. 2016; 5(5): 464–473.

Toripah SS, Abidjulu J, Wehantouw F. Aktivitas Antioksidan dan Kandungan Total Fenolik Ekstrak Daun Kelor (Moringa oleifera Lam). Pharmacon. 2014; 3(4): 37-43.

Krisnadi AD. Kelor Super Nutrisi. Moringa oleifera. Blora : Pusat Informasi dan Pengembangan Tanaman Kelor. 2015.

Rochyani IS, Aryanti E, Suripto. Kandungan fitokimia beberapa jenis tumbuhan lokal yang sering dimanfaatkan sebagai bahan baku obat. Pros Sem Nas Masy Biodiv Indon 1. 2015; (2): 388-391.

Dima LLRH, Lolo WA, Fatimawali. Uji Aktivitas Antibakteri EKkstrak Daun Kelor ( Moringa oleifera L .) Terhadap Bakteri Escherichia coli dan Staphylococcus aureus. Pharmacon Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi. 2016; 5(2), 282–289.

Dewi ZY, Nur A, Hertriani T. Efek Antibakteri dan Penghambatan Biofilm Ekstrak Sereh (Cymbopogon nardus L.)Terhadap Bakteri Streptococcus mutans. Maj Ked Gi Ind. Desember. 2015; 1(2): 136 – 141.

Newman MG, Takei HH, Klokkevold PR, Carranza FA. Carranza’s Clinical Periodontology. Elsevier, Singapore. 2012; 11: 239-51, 483-91.

Kining E, Falah S, Nurhidayat N. The In Vitro Antibiofilm Activity of Water Leaf Extract of Papaya ( Carica papaya L .) against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. 2016; 2(3): 150–163

Merritt JH, Kadouri DE, O’Toole GA. Growing and Analyzing Static Biofilms. Current Protocols in Microbiology1B.1.1-1B.1.18. 2011.

Saising J, Singdam S, Ongsakul M, Voravuthikunchai SP. Lipase, protease, and biofilm as the major virulence factors in staphylococci isolated from acne lesions. BioScience Trends. 2012; 6(4):160-164.

Mathur T, Singhal S, Khan S, Upadhyay DJ, Fatma T, Rattan A. Detection of biofilm formation among the clinical isolates of staphylococci: An evaluation of three different screening methods. Indian Journal of Medical Microbiology. 2006; 24(1) :25-29.

Mayantika A. Perbedaan Daya Antibiofilm Antara Ekstrak Kulit Manggis (Garcinia Mangostana L.) 25% Dan Naocl 2,5% Terhadap Biofilm PorphyromonasGingivalis. Skripsi, UniversitasAirlangga, Surabaya. 2013.

Donlan RM. Biofilm Elimination on Intravascular Catheters: Important Considerations for the Infectious Disease Practicioner. J. Oxford. Atlanta: Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Pervention. 2011. p. 1043.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-12

How to Cite

Linda Rochyani. (2021). The inhibition of leaf extract Moringaoleifera on the formation biofilm bacteria Enterococcus faecalis. DENTA JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI, 14(1), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v14i1.7

Issue

Section

Articles