Differences in Maxillary and Mandibular Premolar Length Distortion at Various Angulation Angles of Periapical Radiographs

Authors

  • Erwin Setyawan Department of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, Dentistry Faculty, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Dyah Triswari Department of Biomedic, Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Sari S A Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v18i1.2

Keywords:

Angulation angle, Bisecting, Periapical, Premolars

Abstract

Background: Periapical radiographic techniques are usually used in root canal treatment. Distortion on bisecting technique periapical radiographs is relatively more common, especially on premolars located at the curved jaw area. Objective: To determine the difference in the length distortion of the maxillary and mandibular premolars at various exposure angles of periapical radiographs. Methods: The research conducted using observational analytic research, and the research design is cross-sectional. The sample used in this study were 30 upper premolars X-rayed using the periapical bisecting technique with a reference angle from the first literature book +30 and a reference angle from the second literature book +40 and 30 lower premolars X-rayed at -10 and -15 angles. Results: On the independent sample T-test, p value<0.05 for both the upper and lower premolars, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in distortion with a reference angle of +30 and +40 on upper premolars and -10 and -15 reference angles on the lower premolars. Discussion: Distortion of periapical radiographs with bisecting technique occurs more easily. The placement of the periapical sensor must be as close as possible to the object so that the correct position of the periapical sensor also plays a role in the formation of distortion. Conclusion: There is a significant difference in the length distortion of the upper and lower premolars on the angle of exposure periapical bisecting radiographs from the two reference books.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Toppo S. Distribusi pemakaian radiografi periapikal dan radiografi panoramik pada pasien impaksi molar ketiga rahang bawah di kota Makassar Distribution of periapical and panoramic radiography on third molar mandibular impaction in Makassar. Journal of Dentomaxillofacial Science [Internet]. 2012;11(2):75–8.

Soraya C, Hayati K, Reni AS. Panjang Rata-rata Gigi Insisivus Sentralis Permanen Maksila Pada Mahasiswa Suku Aceh. Cakradonya Dental Journal [Internet]. 2013;5(2):586–91.

Nurhapsari A. Penatalaksanaan Gigi Premolar Kedua Maksila Dengan Saluran Akar Vertucci Tipe V - laporan Kasus. Odonto : Dental Journal [Internet]. 2014;1(1):53–6.

Heryanto OE, Nehemia B, Iskandar HB. Vertical angulation mandibular first premolar tolerance in periapical projection radiography. J Phys Conf Ser [Internet]. 2018;1073(2):022008. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1073/2/022008

Antolis M, Priaminiarti M, Kiswanjaya B. Vertical Angulation Alteration Tolerance in the Periapical Radiograph of Maxillary Incisor (An in vitro Study). Journal of Dentistry Indonesia [Internet]. 2014;21(2).

Dixon D, Hildebolt C. An overview of radiographic film holders. Dentomaxillofacial Radiology [Internet]. 2005;34(2):67–73. Available from: https://www.birpublications.org/doi/abs/10.1259/dmfr/99945885

Whaites E, Drage N. Essentials of dental radiography and radiology. 5th ed. Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2013.

White SC, Pharoah MJ. Oral Radiology Principles and Interpretation. 7th ed. St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier Mosby; 2014.

Sujarweni VW. Metode Penelitian: Lengkap, Praktis, dan Mudah Dipahami. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press; 2014.

Gegler A, Fontanella V. In vitro evaluation of a method for obtaining periapical radiographs for diagnosis of external apical root resorption. Eur J Orthod. 2008;30(3):315–9.

Felippe MC, Nassri MR, Burgos PG, Freitas SF, Lage-Marques JL. Quality of periapical radiographs taken by undergraduate students during endodontic treatment. In 2008. Available from: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Quality-of-periapical-radiographs-taken-by-students-Felippe-Nassri/ae823c441155bea08a4994a7ec648992689873cc

Boel T. Dental Radiografi : Prinsip Dan Teknik. Medan: USU Press; 2010.

Carlton RR. Digital Radiography: Physical Principles And Quality Control. New York: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2019.

Iannucci JM, Howerton LJ. Dental Radiography: Principles And Techniques. Philadelphia, London: W.B. Saunders; 2017.

Downloads

Published

2024-02-29

How to Cite

Erwin Setyawan, Dyah Triswari, & Sari S A. (2024). Differences in Maxillary and Mandibular Premolar Length Distortion at Various Angulation Angles of Periapical Radiographs. DENTA JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI, 18(1), 18–22. https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v18i1.2

Issue

Section

Articles