Vertical Facial Changes After 6 Months of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment

Authors

  • M. Shulchan Ardiansyah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
  • Dena Chantika Arsarini Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v17i1.8

Keywords:

MP-SN, Fixed Orthodontics, Lateral Cephalometry, Steiner Analysis, Facial Vertical

Abstract

Background: The use of fixed orthodontic appliances can change the vertical face due to the movement of the molars. A lateral cephalometric radiograph was used to assess the outcome of the treatment. Analysis of the vertical facial changes was performed by observing the changes of the MP-SN angle. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine whether there were differences in the vertical face before and after 6 months of fixed orthodontic treatment using the Steiner method. Methods: This study used a case-control design comparing groups before and after 6 months of fixed orthodontic treatment. The sample in this study amounted to 5 people. The vertical measurement of the face is carried out at the MP-SN angle, namely the angle formed by the MP (Mandibular Plane – Go-Gn) line and the SN (Sella-Nasion) line. The data analysis was performed with the program SPSS Version 25. Result: There were no significant changes in the study (p>0.05). The average change is 1.2º. Of the 5 patients, 4 patients (80%) experienced a decrease in MP-SN angle, while 1 patient (20%) experienced an increase in the MP-SN angle. Conclusion: There was no significant change in facial vertical changes before and after 6 months of fixed orthodontic treatment at RSGM UMY. The decrease in the MP-SN angle is caused by the intrusion of the molars which causes the mandible to rotate counterclockwise. The increase in the MP-SN angle is due to the distalization of the molars, resulting in a clockwise rotation of the mandible.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhalajhi SI. Orthodontics The Art and Science. New Delhi; 2015.

Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L. An introduction to orthodontics. Oxford university press; 2019.

Darwis R, Editiawarni T. Hubungan antara sudut interinsisal terhadap profil jaringan lunak wajah pada foto sefalometri Relationship between interincisal angles and facial soft tissue profiles in cephalometric photos. J Kedokt Gigi Univ Padjadjaran. 2018;30(1):15–9.

Whaites E, Drage N. ESSENTIALS OF DENTAL RADIOGRAPHY AND RADIOLOGY. 6th ed. Elsevier; 2020.

Graber LW, Vanarsdall RL, Vig KWL, Huang GJ. Orthodontics-e-book: current principles and techniques. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2016.

Premkumar S. TEXTBOOK OF ORTHODONTICS-E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

Deng J, Li Y, Wang X, Li J, Ding Y, Zhou Y. Evaluation of long-term stability of vertical control in hyperdivergent patients treated with temporary anchorage devices. Curr Med Sci. 2018;38(5):914–9.

Cobourne MT, DiBiase AT. Handbook of Orthodontics E-Book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2015.

Kumari L, Nayan K. Begg’s Technique. Walnut Publication; 2019.

Ding Y, Zhao JH, Deng JR, Wang XJ. Comparison of skeletal changes between female adolescents and adults with hyperdivergent class II division 1 malocclusion After orthodontic treatment. Chinese J Dent Res. 2012;15(2):139.

Alsabbagh B, Al-Sabbagh R. Early correction of a developing class III malocclusion by quick fix appliance: A case report. 2020;

Wahyuningsih S, Hardjono S, Suparwitri S. Perawatan maloklusi angle klas I dengan gigi depan crowding berat dan cross bite menggunakan teknik begg pada pasien dengan kebersihan mulut buruk. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2014;21(2):204–11.

Purwaningsih YRW, Ardhana W, Christnawati C. Perawatan Maloklusi Klas III dengan Reverse Overjet Menggunakan Alat Ortodontik Cekat Teknik Begg. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2013;20(1):112–8.

Rahmawati E, Hardjono S. Perawatan Maloklusi Kelas I Bimaksiler Protrusi disertai Gigi Berdesakan dan Pergeseran Midline menggunakan Teknik Begg. Maj Kedokt Gigi Indones. 2013;20(2):224–30.

Ardani IGAW, Pratiknjo IS, Djaharu’ddin I. Correlation between Dentoalveolar Heights and Vertical Skeletal Patterns in Class I Malocclusion in Ethnic Javanese. Eur J Dent [Internet]. 2020/10/08. 2021 May;15(2):210–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33032332

Moshiri S, Araújo EA, McCray JF, Thiesen G, Kim KB. Cephalometric evaluation of adult anterior open bite non-extraction treatment with Invisalign. Dental Press J Orthod. 2017;22:30–8.

Khlef HN, Hajeer MY, Ajaj MA, Heshmeh O. Evaluation of treatment outcomes of en masse retraction with temporary skeletal anchorage devices in comparison with two-step retraction with conventional anchorage in patients with dentoalveolar protrusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Contemp Clin Dent. 2018;9(4):513.

Abdelhady NA, Tawfik MA, Hammad SM. Maxillary molar distalization in treatment of angle class II malocclusion growing patients: Uncontrolled clinical trial. Int Orthod. 2020;18(1):96–104.

Darabi M, Sadeghi S. Changes of occlusal plane inclination after orthodontic treatment with and without extraction in Class II patients. Capian J Dent Res. 2020;9(1):8–16.

Lubis MM, Fulvian J. Perbedaan tinggi vertikal wajah pada maloklusi Kelas I dan II skeletal The vertical facial height difference between skeletal class I and II malocclusions. Padjadjaran J Dent Res Students. 2021;5(1):51–6.

Downloads

Published

2023-03-06

How to Cite

M. Shulchan Ardiansyah, & Dena Chantika Arsarini. (2023). Vertical Facial Changes After 6 Months of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment. DENTA JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI, 17(1), 42–46. https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v17i1.8

Issue

Section

Articles