Comparison between Compression Strength of Composite Resin with and without Stamp Technique

Authors

  • Yusrini Pasril Dental Conservation, Rehabilitative Division, Dentistry Study Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Chantika Azzahra Anindita Putri Dentistry Study Program, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v18i2.3

Keywords:

Composite Resins, Compression Strength, Oxygen Inhibited Layer, Polymerization, Stamp Technique

Abstract

Background: This study aims to determine whether there is a difference in compression strength between resin composites that use the stamp technique and those that do not use the stamp technique. Objective: To identify the effect of the stamp technique with occlusal matrix on the compression strength and compare it with the one without stamp technique. Materials and methods: This study used an occlusal matrix from a transparent impression made of silicone to print the occlusal teeth. This transparent impression was attached to the resin surface composite prior to polymerization and remained on the surface until polymerization ended. The advantage of using this transparent occlusal matrix is ​​that the light cure can penetrate through the transparent layer of the impression. It can be used to isolate oxygen during polymerization. Results: The average compression strength of composite resin with the stamp technique was 128.5300 ±17.23023 MPa, while composite resin without the stamp technique was 91.2460 ±8,72802 MPa. Conclusion: This study showed the difference between the two test groups, where the resin composite using the stamp strength had a higher compression strength.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Mundung C, Wowor VNS, Wicaksono DA. Comparison Test Strength Compression Composite Resin Filling with Horizontal Incremental Technique and Bulk Technique. e-GIGI. 2018; 6(2): 56–60.

Zakiyah D, Effendy R, Prasetyo EA. The effect of glycerin on the surface hardness and roughness of nanofill composite. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 2019; 8(2):104.

Istinah I, Aryati Ekoningtyas E, Benjamin B. Difference Influence Hydrogen Peroxide 35% And Carbamide Peroxide 35% Against Microleakage in Nanohybrid Composite Resin. Odonto: Dental Journal. 2015; 2(1): 20.

Bijelic-Donova J, Garoushi S, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition layer of composite resins: Effects of layer thickness and surface layer treatment on the interlayer bond strength. European Journal of Oral Sciences. 2015;123(1): 53–60.

Tangkudung MU, Trilaksana AC. Glycerin for resin composite restoration: Literature Review. Makassar Dent J. 2019; 8(3): 169–72.

Robertson L, Phaneuf M, Haimeur A, Pesun I, França R. Degree of Conversion and Oxygen-Inhibited Layer Effect of Three Dental Adhesives. Dentistry Journal. 2016;4(4):37.

Tambake DrNJ, Tambake DrS, Gandhi DrN, Jadhav DrY, Madhu DrK, Burad Dr.P. Stamp technique - New perspective of Aesthetic Dentistry : A Case Report. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences. 2017; 16(06): 49–51.

Moraru I, Bugal A, Gheorghe A, Popescu D, Râc AM. Why using the stamp technique in Class I cavities is a first choice filling technique. Romanian Journal of Medical and Dental Education. 2019;8(1):2–7.

Choudhari, Sahil, and Manish Ranjan. Knowledge, awareness, and perception regarding occlusal stamp technique for composite restorations. Drug Invention Today. 2019: 2512-2517.

Moldovan M, Balazsi R, Soanca A, Roman A, Sarosi C, Prodan D, et al. Evaluation of the Degree of Conversion, Residual Monomers and Mechanical Properties of Some Light-Cured Dental Resin Composites. Materials. 2019;12(13): 2109.

Tsujimoto A, Barkmeier WW, Takamizawa T, Latta MA, Miyazaki M. Influence of the Oxygen-inhibited Layer on Bonding Performance of Dental Adhesive Systems: Surface Free Energy Perspectives. The Journal of Adhesive Dentistry. 2016; 18;18(1): 51–8.

Dursun E, Fron-Chabouis H, Attal JP, Raskin A. Bisphenol A Release: Survey of the Composition of Dental Composite Resins. TODENTJ. 2016; 10(1): 446–53.

Shamra F, Prasad K, Ghorpade B, Sajeev N. Microbrush Stamp Technique for Direct Composite Resin Restoration-A Clinical Case Report. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2019; 7(12): 5.

Santos ACMQS, Monticeli FM, Ornaghi H, Santos LF de P, Cioffi MOH. Porosity characterization and respective influence on the short-beam strength of advanced composite processed by resin transfer and compression molding. Polymers and Polymer Composites. 2021; 29(8): 1353–62.

Ahmed YT, Abouseedou HM, Hamza, FM, AlQalam MM, Naser YM. Awareness of oxygen inhibited layer effects on composite resins and how to prevent: A survey-based study. Journal of Applied Dental and Medical Sciences. 2021; 7(1): 78–82.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-31

How to Cite

Yusrini Pasril, & Chantika Azzahra Anindita Putri. (2024). Comparison between Compression Strength of Composite Resin with and without Stamp Technique. DENTA JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI, 18(2), 70–76. https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v18i2.3

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.