Differences of Composite Resin Surface Hardness After Exposure to Filter Cigarette and Electric Cigarette Smoke

Authors

  • Alvi Rizqi Amaliyah mahasiswa
  • Arwin Diva Nafida Dentistry Programs, Medical Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Berta Ivana Priladiantika Dentistry Programs, Medical Faculty, Jenderal Soedirman University
  • Bambang Tri Hartomo Teeth and Mouth Dentistry Hospital Unsoed, Jenderal Soedirman University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v16i2.2

Keywords:

Awareness, COVID-19 and Undergraduate Dentistry Students

Abstract

Background: Composite resin is a dental filling material that has several mechanical properties, one of which is surface hardness. Surface hardness can increase due to several factors such as smoking habits. Filter cigarette is the second most common type of cigarette in Indonesia and electric cigaretteis the third most common type of cigarette in Indonesia. Both types of cigarettes can affect the surface hardness of the composite resin due to a decrease in the pH of saliva produced from cigarette smoke. Objective: This study aimed to determine the difference in surface hardness of thecomposite resin after exposure to filter cigarette smoke and electric cigarette. Methods: 27 samples of nanohybrid composite resin were divided into three groups. Group 1 as a control group was immersed in artificial saliva and was not exposed to cigarette smoke, group 2 wasthe group that was treated with filter cigarette smoke and group 3 was the group that was treated with electric cigarette. Furthermore, the groups were tested for surface hardness using a Vickers hardness tester. Results: The surface hardness test of the composite resin showed an increase in the control group and a decrease in the treatment group, with the highest decrease in the filter cigarette smoke treatment group. The results of the paired t-test and one-way ANOVA test showed that the p-value was >0.00 so there was no difference between the pre-test and post-test mean differences in each group and there was no difference between the mean of each group Conclusion: There was no difference before and after exposure to filter cigarette or electric cigarette smoke.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kemenkes RI. Hasil Utama Riskesdas 2018. Jakarta; 2018. p. 81.

Fitriani, K., Mustafa, Z.. Penggunaan Rokok Elektrik (Vape) di Kota Makassar Perspektif Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab. 2020; 1(2): 114-7.

Rohmani, A., Yazid, N., Rahmawati, A. A. Rokok Elektrik dan Rokok Konvensional Merusak Alveolus Paru. In: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Unimus; 2018 (pp 27-32).

Puspitasari, S. A., Siswomihardjo, W., Harsini. Perbandingan Kekasaran Permukaan Resin Komposit Nanofiller pada Perendaman Saliva pH Asam. Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi. 2016; 2(5): 15-9.

Irpansyah, Diana, S., Azizah, A. Pengaruh Minuman Energi dan Susu Fermentasi Terhadap Pelepasan Ion Fosfat dan Fluor Resin Komposit Bioaktif. Dentin Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi. 2020; 4 (3): 116-7.

Shen, C., Rawls, H. R., Esquivel-Upshaw, J. F. Philips’ Science Of Dental Material. 13th Ed. Missouri. Elsevier; 2022.

Rezaie, H.R., Rizi, B.H., Khamseh, M.M.R., Öchsner, A. A. Review on Dental Materials. Switzerland: Springer; 2020.

Mustakim, K. R. Pengaruh Asap Rokok Filter dan Elektrik terhadap Perubahan Warna Gigi Artifisial Akrilik [skripsi]. Makassar: Fakultas Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar; 2016.

Langen, E. N., Rumampuk, J. F., Leman, M. A. Pengaruh Saliva Buatan Dan Belimbing Wuluh (Averrhoa Bilimibi L.) Terhadap Kekerasan Resin Komposit Nano Hybrid. Jurnal Ilmiah Farmasi. 2017; 6(1): 9-15.

Wirawan, E., Puspita, S. Hubungan pH Saliva dan Krmampuan Buffer Dengan DMF-T Dan def-t Pada Periode Gigi Bercampur Anak Usia 6-12 Tahun. Insisiva Dental Journal. 2017; 6(1): 25-30.

Fitriyana, D. C. Uji Pengaruh Saliva Buatan Terhadap Kekuatan Tekan Semen IonomerKaca Tipe II Yang Direndam Dalam Minuman Isonik. 2014; 2(2).

Somayaji, S. K., Amalan, A., Ginjupalli, K. Effect of Different Acidic Beverages on Microhardness of Nanohybrid Composite, Giomer, and Microhybrid Composite. World Journal Dental. 2016; 7(3): 126-8.

Ikhsan, N., Kasuma, N., Kustantiningtyastuti, D. Perbedaan Kekerasan PermukaanBahan Restorasi Resin Komposit Nanofiller yang Direndam dalam Minuman Ringan Berkarbonasi dan Minuman Beralkohol. Andalas Dental Journal. 2016; 4(1): 55-66.

Dewi, N. N. S. S. S. L., Pertiwi, N. K. F. R. Perbedaan Tingkat Kekerasan Permukaan Mikrofiller Resin Komposit Dan Nanofiller Resin Komposit Setelah Direndam Larutan Kopi. Bali Dental Journal. 2020; 4(2):104-8.

Sitanggang, P., Elita, T., Jane, W. Uji Kekerasan Komposit Terhadap Rendaman Buah Jeruk Nipis (Citrus Aurantifolia). Jurnal e-Gigi. 2015; 3(1).

Noort, R.V., Introduction to Dental materials. 4th ed. Contact Dermatitis. China. Elsevier B.V. 2013.

Chandra, J., Setyowati, L., Setyabudi. Kekasaran Permukaan Resin Komposit Nanofiller dan Nanohybrid Setelah Paparan Asap Rokok Kretek. Conservative Dentistry Journal. 2018; 8(1): 30-5.

Thomas, C. A. Pengaruh Asap Rokok Elektrik (Pod) Terhadap Kekasaran Permukaan Resin Komposit Nanohybrid [skripsi]. Jakarta: University Of Trisakti; 2021.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-31

How to Cite

Alvi Rizqi Amaliyah, Arwin Diva Nafida, Berta Ivana Priladiantika, & Bambang Tri Hartomo. (2022). Differences of Composite Resin Surface Hardness After Exposure to Filter Cigarette and Electric Cigarette Smoke. DENTA JURNAL KEDOKTERAN GIGI, 16(2), 67–73. https://doi.org/10.30649/denta.v16i2.2

Issue

Section

Articles